Search for: All records

Unbiased science dissemination has the potential to alleviate some of the known gender disparities in academia by exposing female scholars’ work to other scientists and the public. And yet, we lack comprehensive understanding of the relationship between gender and science dissemination online. Our large-scale analyses, encompassing half a million scholars, revealed that female scholars’ work is mentioned less frequently than male scholars’ work in all research areas. When exploring the characteristics associated with online success, we found that the impact of prior work, social capital, and gendered tie formation in coauthorship networks are linked with online success for men, but not for women—even in the areas with the highest female representation. These results suggest that while men’s scientific impact and collaboration networks are associated with higher visibility online, there are no universally identifiable facets associated with success for women. Our comprehensive empirical evidence indicates that the gender gap in online science dissemination is coupled with a lack of understanding the characteristics that are linked with female scholars’ success, which might hinder efforts to close the gender gap in visibility. 

Crowdfunding platforms promise to disrupt investing as they bypass traditional financial institutions through peer-to-peer transactions. To stay functional, these platforms require a supply of investors who are willing to contribute to campaigns. Yet, little is known about the retention of investors in this setting. Using four years of data from a leading equity crowdfunding platform, we empirically study the length and success of investor activity on the platform. We analyze temporal variations in these outcomes and explain patterns using statistical modeling. Our models are based on information about user's past and current investment decisions, i.e., content-based and structural similarities between the campaigns they invest in. We uncover the role of past successes and diversity of investment decisions for novice vs. serial investors. Our results inform potential strategies for increasing the retention of investors and improving their decisions on crowdfunding platforms.